When and why did the global switch from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV occur?

Study for the Poliovirus and Poliomyelitis Test. Prepare with engaging flashcards and detailed multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Ace your exam with confidence!

Multiple Choice

When and why did the global switch from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV occur?

Explanation:
The main idea is to reduce the risk from vaccine-derived poliovirus by removing the type 2 component of the oral vaccine once type 2 wild poliovirus had been eradicated. In 2016, countries worldwide switched from trivalent OPV (covering types 1, 2, and 3) to bivalent OPV (types 1 and 3). This eliminated the live type 2 strain from routine vaccination, lowering the chance that the attenuated type 2 virus could revert and cause circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 outbreaks. To keep protection against types 1 and 3, bOPV is used, and many places added IPV to maintain immunity to type 2 without the risks tied to a live vaccine strain. The other dates and reasons don’t match the eradication timeline or the rationale for reducing cVDPV2 risk.

The main idea is to reduce the risk from vaccine-derived poliovirus by removing the type 2 component of the oral vaccine once type 2 wild poliovirus had been eradicated. In 2016, countries worldwide switched from trivalent OPV (covering types 1, 2, and 3) to bivalent OPV (types 1 and 3). This eliminated the live type 2 strain from routine vaccination, lowering the chance that the attenuated type 2 virus could revert and cause circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 outbreaks. To keep protection against types 1 and 3, bOPV is used, and many places added IPV to maintain immunity to type 2 without the risks tied to a live vaccine strain. The other dates and reasons don’t match the eradication timeline or the rationale for reducing cVDPV2 risk.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy